Post by account_disabled on Dec 28, 2023 5:41:48 GMT
Aof the Constitutional Court vested under art. lit. d from the Constitution of Romania of art. paragraph lit. d and of art. of Law no. regarding the organization and functioning of the Constitutional Court debated the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. of the Criminal Procedure Code which have the following content After the termination of the technical surveillance measure the prosecutor informs in writing within days at most each subject of a warrant about the technical surveillance measure that was taken in his regard.
After the moment of information the supervised person has the Country Email List right to learn upon request the content of the minutes in which the technical supervision activities carried out are recorded. Also the prosecutor must ensure upon request the listening of conversations communications or conversations or the viewing of the images resulting from the technical surveillance activity. The deadline for formulating the request is days from the date of communication of the written information provided for in para.
The prosecutor may with reasons postpone the information or the presentation ofactivities are stored or the playback minutes if this could lead to a disrupting or jeopardizing the proper conduct of the criminal investigation in question b jeopardizing the safety of the victim witnesses or their family members c difficulties in the technical supervision of other persons involved in the case. The postponement provided for in para. it can be ordered at the latest until the end of the criminal investigation or until the case is closed. Following the deliberations with a majority of votes the Constitutional Court admitted the exception of unconstitutionality and found that the legislative solution contained.
After the moment of information the supervised person has the Country Email List right to learn upon request the content of the minutes in which the technical supervision activities carried out are recorded. Also the prosecutor must ensure upon request the listening of conversations communications or conversations or the viewing of the images resulting from the technical surveillance activity. The deadline for formulating the request is days from the date of communication of the written information provided for in para.
The prosecutor may with reasons postpone the information or the presentation ofactivities are stored or the playback minutes if this could lead to a disrupting or jeopardizing the proper conduct of the criminal investigation in question b jeopardizing the safety of the victim witnesses or their family members c difficulties in the technical supervision of other persons involved in the case. The postponement provided for in para. it can be ordered at the latest until the end of the criminal investigation or until the case is closed. Following the deliberations with a majority of votes the Constitutional Court admitted the exception of unconstitutionality and found that the legislative solution contained.